I took the blows and did it my way…..!
Reply
Freedom Of Speech only for Corrupt Liars
Before The May 6 2002 Assassination
Pim Fortuyn Assassin Needs To Be Released
Here it is: former minister of Justice and prime minister Dries van Agt thinks that Volkert van der Graaf who assassinated Pim Fortuyn needs to be released. “ a perpetrator as Volkert should not be discriminated.” He said.
Reports Defending The Assassin
Picture of the Assassin
Corrupt Justice: The assassin and radical animal rights activist should be released because he served the political elite by killing the man who had the courage to break the conspiracy of silence and expose your crimes against humanity. The cowards and hypocrites had Pim Fortuyn assassinated because they could not ridicule him into silence. Yes I said it…..you all should be jailed criminals…..!
Pim Fortuyn: One For All
Painter’s show honors slain politician, free speech
This month we have the opportunity to see the abstract paintings of Lisette Muntslag in an exhibition, “Soul Survivor.” She is dedicating this exhibit at the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Poughkeepsie to Pim Furtuyn, a controversial politician from the Netherlands who was assassinated in 2002. Poughkeepsie Journal
Killing Pim Fortuyn and Worshipping Ayaan Hirsi Ali
First Published by This I Believe
Like so many asylum seekers, Hirsi Ali concocted a scheme to get asylum in the Netherlands. She climbed her way up the social ladder as an employee of the socialist Party PVDA and became a citizen. When Professor Pim Fortuyn broke the conspiracy of silence and challenged their dangerous and destructive multicultural agenda, which includes condoning and financing the oppression of minority women, Hirsi Ali was hand-picked by the so-called tolerant social democrats to label him a racist and danger to minorities.
The media labeled him the right-wing anti-immigrant populist and a Hitler.On May 6, 2002 Pim Fortuyn was assassinated and Hirsi Ali became an instant celebrity. With the blessing of the feminist elite, who have been instrumental in the social isolation of minority women (with children), she was elected a member of the Dutch parliament for the free market liberal party VVD.
Hirsi Ali took advantage of the anything and everything goes culture in the West and had everybody hanging on her every word and meeting her every need. While references to God and religion are subjected to vicious attacks, Hirsi Ali is being worshipped as if she were God. Pim Fortuyn was killed because he had the courage to take a stand against the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in the Netherlands.
Now the so-called atheist Muslim is making waves with exactly what he was deprived of, his freedom of thought and right to free speech. Hirsi Ali’s former socialist comrades, who in 2002 demonized Pim Fortuyn resulting in his murder 4 years ago, come out with the details about her fraud, which led to another uproar. Now that she is being questioned I am again insulted with the countless headlines and sob stories about her mistreatment.
MEDIA REPORTS
Hirsi Ali said that she was on a mission. That mission in Europe is now completed and she resigned from the Dutch Parliament. Hirsi Ali brings down Dutch government
She is now on her way to conquer the United States. She has the clearance of the U.S State department and also has a job waiting for her at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington D. C.
Societies priding themselves as being enlightened and civilized with respect for human rights are destroying the lives of the innocent in their midst and worshipping deception, corruption and those who satisfy the perverted pleasures of the powers that be. Because of the media hype about Hirsi Ali, the rest of the world knows about the conditions of Muslim woman in the Netherlands.
Pim Fortuyn, may his soul rest in peace, against all odds defended the dignity of all (minority) women in the Netherlands. Blinded by sensationalism the media hypes up one person and fails to report the truth. Other women (mothers) such as myself, Surinam-born, Dutch citizens by birth, are being deprived of their freedom of choice and subjected to inhumane treatment by the Dutch government. I was arbitrarily deprived of my nationality, denied the right to regain my nationality, forced into a marriage to remain in the Netherlands, denied educational opportunities and the right to make a living. My life needed to be governed by the state.
Once a slave, always a slave. According to the Dutch political elite, individual liberty and freedom of choice are only for the so-called educated elite and feminists. When I challenged this notion, I was among other things intimidated and threatened that my life would not be safe in the Netherlands if I did not remain silent and accept the brutality against my person.
I escaped the torture of the Netherlands and applied for asylum in 2000, but in 2002 the U. S Board of Immigration Appeals denied my request for protection and ordered me deported back to perilous conditions, while another woman from the Netherlands with the help of the Dutch government was granted asylum in the U.S in November 2001.
If anything, the worshipping of Ayaan Hirsi Ali (or shall I say Ms. Magan because that is her assumed real name) exposed the hypocrisy of the mighty and superior secular West. Like in the dark days past some lives are still worth more than others and freedom is not for all, freedom is only just for some. The more things change, the more they remain the same and as Marvin Gaye sang, it makes me wanna holler!
The Bribing Continues
“BERLIN — Dutch writer Ayaan Hirsi Ali is to receive a special award from German publishing house Axel Springer in recognition of her “courage and commitment to freedom as a women’s rights campaigner and critic of Islam.” The publisher of Germany’s biggest selling daily Bild said Hirsi Ali will be awarded the €25,000 ($32,375) prize Thursday in Berlin. Spiegel has More
The Netherlands Provided The Weapons
‘Sue Netherlands over Suriname coup’
” A committee representing victims of a 1980 coup in Suriname, a former Dutch colony, wants the Netherlands sued before the World Court over its alleged role in bringing Dési Bouterse to power.
Romeo Hoost, president of the Committee for the Remembrance of Victims in Suriname, announced the committee’s intention on Sunday during the radio programme Met Het Oog Op Morgen.
The move follows new revelations during last Thursday’s programme Andere Tijden on NPS public television. In the programme, the Dutch ambassador to Suriname at the time, Max Vegelin van Claerbergen, said that the head of the Dutch military mission to Suriname, colonel Hans Valk, was the brains behind the coup.
The mission had been stationed in the small Latin American country since it gained its independence from the Netherlands in 1975, supporting the development of the Surinamese armed forces. The ambassador said he was aware at the time that colonel Valk was pitting Bouterse and other non-commissioned officers against the Surinamese government.
Picture: Radio Netherlands Worldwide
Report shelved
Bouterse was Suriname’s de facto ruler until his resignation in 1988. He was involved in the infamous “December murders” of 1982, in which fifteen opponents of Bouterse’s military rule were assassinated. In 1999, Bouterse was convicted in absentia in the Netherlands for cocaine trafficking and an international arrest warrant was issued.
The TV programme also spoke to a Dutch intelligence officer, major Koen Koenders, who investigated the work of the Dutch military mission. Koenders told the programme he filed a report detailing Valk’s involvement in the coup.
Without his help, Koenders said, “The coup would never have happened. Without the help they wouldn’t have had the capacity to succeed.”
A civil servant in the defence ministry, Joris Demmink, judged at the time that the report contained “a litany of gossip and stories that he had already heard in 1980 and 1981″, and tossed it in a drawer, rather than show it to the minister. Demmink is currently the top civil servant at the justice ministry.
Koenders now thinks his report was shelved “because a country can never admit that it was involved in the overthrow of a foreign government.”
From his retirement home in France, Vegelin van Claerbergen echoes Koenders’ words. “It would be insupportable to the Dutch way of thinking that a very democratic, ‘soft’ country would go and topple another democracy in another country. Of course that couldn’t be,” the former ambassador told NPS.
The Hague vs. The Hague?
Speaking on Dutch radio, opposition member of parliament Harry van Bommel (Socialist Party) said Vegelin van Claerbergen’s awareness of Valk’s machinations meant that the coup had been staged with the knowledge and even the approval of the Netherlands.
He said the ambassador must have informed the Netherlands of colonel Valk’s role at the time. He has called for the government to release confidential documents on the matter.
An earlier attempt by the Dutch parliament in 1983 to investigate the Dutch role in the coup revealed how Valk frequently visited the Surinamese army barracks to advise the non-commissioned officers in the weeks leading up the the coup. The parliamentary committee’s findings did not then lead to any judicial steps against the Dutch government.
But that was before there was a Committee for the Remembrance of Victims in Suriname. The committee’s president, Romeo Hoost, says it has asked lawyers to look into the feasibility of bringing a case against the Netherlands before the International Court of Justice, which, ironically, is based in the seat of the Dutch government, The Hague.
The new revelations are also causing a stir in Suriname. Hoost told Met Het Oog Op Morgen that the well-known Suriname columnist Theo Para has already written an open letter to Suriname president Venetiaan asking him to sue the Netherlands before the ICC in The Hague.”
Published 23-03-2009 by www.nrc.nl archive : international
Don’t Confine Me
The social, tolerant, multicultural, progressive liberals define me by race, ethnicity, skin color, gender, sexual orientation and social status but what they fail to realize is, that I am so much more than what their tunnel vision can conceive.
The Corrupt Words That Became Flesh
“Pim Foruyn is not just right, he is extreme right”, is a nationalist and a populist, a charlatan” Paul Rosenmuller (Groenlinks, Greenleft aka Communist):
“Fortuyn is an eichman, an untermensh, an inferior human being, a racist” Marcel van Dam (PVDA, social democrats, labor)
“Pim Fortuyn is a danger for the country, a danger to society” Wim Kok (PVDA social democrats, labor)
“Pim Fortuyn is fascist, he reminds me of Anton Mussert” Rob Oudkerk (PVDA, social democrats, labor)
“I see a parallel with the 30’s, Pim Fortuyn is the upcoming Nazism and Fascism” Hans Kombrink (PVDA, social democrats, labor)
“Pim Fortuyn is crazy, it is life threatening what he is doing” Rogier van Boxtell (D66, social, liberal, progressive)
“Pim Fortuyn is a man with the intelligence of Adolf Hitler and the charm of Heinrich” Matty Verkamman ( Trouw Newpaper Columnist)
“Pim Fortuyn is a dangerous man” Gerrit Zalm (VVD, People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy)
“Fortuyn is Mussolini” Bas Eenhoorn (VVD, People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy)
“Holland will look like a “toilet figure” with Pim Fortuyn as Prime Minister” Frits Bolkenstein (VVD, People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy)
“Did we forget Anna Frank, Pim Fortuyn wants a country where people of a certain faith, certain culture a different background can be discriminated” Thom de Graaf (D66 social, liberal, progressive)
“There is no reason to trust Fortuyn. What did this man do? It is a charlatan. A rat-catcher. Jan Marijnissen (Socialist Party)
Freedom of Expression for All
“Freedom House’s annual survey of freedom of the press around the world found that for the first time in eight years, global media freedom showed no overall decline. The report came out just before Thursday’s observance of the U.N.-declared World Press Freedom Day.”
“As usual, Western democracies ranked high in the Washington-based group’s freedom of the pressreport.”
The Windhoek Declaration was a call to arms to protect the fundamental principles of the freedom of expression as enshrined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states:
“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
Freedom of Expression for all, not just some….!